|
|
|
| Registros recuperados: 17 | |
|
| |
|
|
| Plummer, Ryan; Brock University, Canada; Stockholm Resilience Centre, Sweden; ryan.plummer@brocku.ca; Armitage, Derek R; University of Waterloo, Canada; derek.armitage@uwaterloo.ca; de Loë, Rob C; University of Waterloo, Canada; rdeloe@uwaterloo.ca. |
| We provide a systematic review of the adaptive comanagement (ACM) literature to (i) investigate how the concept of governance is considered and (ii) examine what insights ACM offers with reference to six key concerns in environmental governance literature: accountability and legitimacy; actors and roles; fit, interplay, and scale; adaptiveness, flexibility, and learning; evaluation and monitoring; and, knowledge. Findings from the systematic review uncover a complicated relationship with evidence of conceptual closeness as well as relational ambiguities. The findings also reveal several specific contributions from the ACM literature to each of the six key environmental governance concerns, including applied strategies for sharing power and responsibility... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptive comanagement; Adaptive governance; Environmental governance; Integrated management; Multilevel governance; Resilience; Systematic review. |
| Ano: 2013 |
|
| |
|
|
| Whaley, Luke; Water Science Institute, Cranfield University; l.whaley@cranfield.ac.uk; Weatherhead, Edward K.; Water Science Institute, Cranfield University; k.weatherhead@cranfield.ac.uk. |
| Scholars of comanagement are faced with a difficult methodological challenge. As comanagement has evolved and diversified it has increasingly merged with the field of adaptive management and related concepts that derive from resilience thinking and complex adaptive systems theory. In addition to earlier considerations of power sharing, institution building, and trust, the adaptive turn in comanagement has brought attention to the process of social learning and a focus on concepts such as scale, self-organization, and system trajectory. At the same time, a number of scholars are calling for a more integrated approach to studying (adaptive) comanagement that is able to situate these normative concepts within a critical understanding of how context and power... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Synthesis |
Palavras-chave: Comanagement; Adaptive comanagement; IAD Framework; Politicized IAD Framework; Methodology; Institutions; Power; Discourse; Resilience. |
| Ano: 2014 |
|
| |
|
|
| Krasny, Marianne E; Cornell University; mek2@cornell.edu; Delia, Jesse; ; jessedelia@gmail.com. |
| University campus sustainability initiatives have proliferated over the last decade. We contend that such initiatives benefit from applying conceptual frameworks to help understand and guide their activities and from a focus on campus open space and natural areas management. Informed by an adaptive comanagement framework encompassing social learning, social capital, and shared action, we used semistructured interviews to examine student participation in the immediate response and longer-term policy formulation following a crisis that occurred in a campus natural area. Students exhibited social learning as demonstrated by reflection and the integration of new ideas through discussions with administrators and peers, as well as social capital through... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptive comanagement; Natural areas; Sustainability; University. |
| Ano: 2014 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Druschke, Caroline Gottschalk; University of Rhode Island; cgd@uri.edu; Hychka, Kristen C.; U.S. EPA, Atlantic Ecology Division; khychka@gmail.com. |
| We look to a particular social-ecological system, the restoration community in Rhode Island, USA and the rivers, wetlands, marshes, and estuaries they work to protect, to draw connections between communication, community involvement, and ecological restoration project success. Offering real-world examples drawn from interviews with 27 local, state, federal, and nonprofit restoration managers, we synthesize the mechanisms that managers found effective to argue that the communication employed by resource managers in each phase of the restoration process, in prioritization, implementation, and monitoring, and for garnering broad-based support, shapes the quality of public engagement in natural resources management, which, in turn, can impact the stakeholder,... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptive comanagement; Adaptive management; Communication; Discourse analysis; Natural resource management; Public engagement; Public participation; Restoration; River; Stakeholder engagement; Water. |
| Ano: 2015 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Childs, Cameron; School of Sustainability, Arizona State University; cameron.childs@hotmail.com; York, Abigail M.; School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, Arizona State University; Abigail.York@asu.edu; White, Dave; School of Community Resources and Development, Decision Center for a Desert City, Arizona State University;; Schoon, Michael L.; School of Sustainability, Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, Arizona State University;; Bodner, Gitanjali S.; The Nature Conservancy, Tucson, Arizona;. |
| Adaptive comanagement endeavors to increase knowledge and responsiveness in the face of uncertainty and complexity. However, when collaboration between agency and nonagency stakeholders is mandated, rigid institutions may hinder participation and ecological outcomes. In this case study we analyzed qualitative data to understand how participants perceive strengths and challenges within an emerging adaptive comanagement in the Agua Fria Watershed in Arizona, USA that utilizes insight and personnel from a long-enduring comanagement project, Las Cienegas. Our work demonstrates that general lessons and approaches from one project may be transferable, but particular institutions, management structures, or projects must be place-specific. As public agencies... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptive comanagement; Agua Fria watershed Arizona; Governance network; Qualitative research. |
| Ano: 2013 |
|
| |
|
|
| Cook, Hadrian; School of Natural and Built Environments, Kingston University, London; h.cook@kingston.ac.uk; Benson, David; Environment and Sustainability Institute, Department of Politics, University of Exeter, Cornwall; d.i.benson@exeter.ac.uk; Couldrick, Laurence; Westcountry Rivers Trust, Stoke Climsland, Callington, Cornwall; Laurence@wrt.org.uk. |
| The adoption of bioregionalism by institutions that are instrumental in river basin management has significant potential to resolve complex water resource management problems. The Westcountry Rivers Trust (WRT) in England provides an example of how localized bioregional institutionalization of adaptive comanagement, consensus decision making, local participation, indigenous technical and social knowledge, and “win-win” outcomes can potentially lead to resilient partnership working. Our analysis of the WRT’s effectiveness in confronting nonpoint source water pollution, previously impervious to centralized agency responses, provides scope for lesson-drawing on institutional design, public engagement, and effective operation,... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptive comanagement; Bioregionalism; Bioregional planning; Institutions; Lesson-drawing; Partnership. |
| Ano: 2016 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Becker, Gert; VU University Amsterdam, Institute for Environmental Studies; g.becker@vu.nl; Huitema, Dave; VU University Amsterdam, Institute for Environmental Studies; Netherlands Open University, Faculty of Management, Science and Technology; dave.huitema@ivm.vu.nl; Aerts, Jeroen C.J.H.; VU University Amsterdam, Institute for Environmental Studies; jeroen.aerts@vu.nl. |
| Centrally administered bureaucracies are ill suited to managing the environmental resources of complex social-ecological systems. Therefore management approaches are required that can better deal with its complexity and uncertainty, which are further exacerbated by developments such as climate change. Adaptive comanagement (ACM) has emerged as a relatively novel governance approach and potential solution to the challenges arising. Adaptive comanagement hinges on certain institutional prescriptions intended to enhance the adaptability of management by improving the comprehension of and response to the complex context and surprises of social-ecological systems. The ACM literature describes that for enhanced adaptability, institutional arrangements should be... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptability; Adaptive comanagement; Flood management; German Rhine basin. |
| Ano: 2015 |
|
| |
|
|
| Baird, Julia; Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University; jbaird@brocku.ca; Plummer, Ryan; Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University; Stockholm Resilience Centre; ryan.plummer@brocku.ca; Pickering, Kerrie; Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University; kpickering@brocku.ca. |
| Climate change adaptation presents a challenge to current top-down governance structures, including the tension between provision of public goods and actions required by diverse stakeholders, including private actors. Alternative governance approaches that facilitate participation and learning across scales are gaining attention for their ability to bring together diverse actors across sectors and to foster adaptive capacity and resilience. We have described the method and outcomes from the application of a social-ecological inventory to “prime,” i.e., hasten the development of, a regional climate change adaptation network. The social-ecological inventory tool draws on the social-ecological systems approach in which social and... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed article |
Palavras-chave: Adaptive comanagement; Climate change adaptation; Local knowledge; Social-ecological system. |
| Ano: 2014 |
|
| |
|
|
| Lundholm, Cecilia; Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; Centre for Teaching & Learning in the Social Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Education, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; cecilia.lundholm@cesam.su.se; Crona, Beatrice; Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; beatrice.crona@stockholmresilience.su.se; Chabay, Ilan; Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam, Germany; Helmholtz Alliance on Sustainability and Social Compatibility of Future Energy Infrastructure, University of Stuttgart, Germany; ilan.chabay@gmail.com. |
| Adaptive comanagement (ACM) has been suggested as the way to successfully achieve sustainable environmental governance. Despite excellent research, the field still suffers from underdeveloped frameworks of causality. To address this issue, we suggest a framework that integrates the structural frame of Plummer and Fitzgibbons’ “adaptive comanagement” with the specific process characteristics of Senecah’s “Trinity of Voice.” The resulting conceptual hybrid is used to guide the comparison of two cases of stakeholder participation in fisheries management—the Swedish Co-management Initiative and the Polish Fisheries Roundtable. We examine how different components of preconditions and the... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptive comanagement; Fisheries; Fisheries governance; Learning; Participation; Stakeholder dialogue; Trinity of Voice. |
| Ano: 2014 |
|
| |
|
| |
| Registros recuperados: 17 | |
|
|
|
